Hi Dne Wed, 19 Aug 2009 04:44:18 +0000 Leinier Cruz Salfran <salfra...@ipigto.rimed.cu> napsal(a):
> El mar, 18-08-2009 a las 23:30 +0200, Michal Čihař escribió:
> > Dne Tue, 18 Aug 2009 01:44:08 +0000
> > Just quick review:
> >
> > - you add change license stuff in debian diff without any explanation
>
> I made one change in the license (debian/copyright): the openssl library
> exception
> did I made something wrong?
> i followed [1]
But it is the author of the code who can add the exception, not you as
the packager.
> > - debian/rules contains lot of commented out things, it looks like this
> > package is ideal candidate for minimal dh based debian/rules
>
> I commented the lines that I do not use for package construct, for
> example:
> # dh_installmenu
> # dh_installdebconf
> # dh_installlogrotate
> # dh_installemacsen
> # dh_installpam
> # dh_installmime
> # dh_installinit
> # dh_installcron
> # dh_installinfo
> # dh_installman
>
> should I remove it?
Yes, please remove things you do not use. Or just use minimal dh based
debian/rules (/usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny), which seem
to perfectly fit your case.
> > - how did you choose soname for the library? what if upstream decides
> > for different numbering later?
>
> I am in contact with the author
So the upstream will adapt your numbering?
> > - lintian -I --pendantic:
> > I: libsockets++ source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
>
> this is required?
No, but highly recommended.
> > I: libsockets++ source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field
> > "section" in package libsockets++2
>
> i used 'dh_make' to contruct 'debian' directory then I modified what I
> needed
You have specified same section for source package and for one binary,
it is not needed.
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
