Hello Vincent, Just found your reply in google groups. (Please please please please CC me too :-) (please?))
> > I also have a question. Should I change anything else in debian/rules to > > > > indicate that this is not an architecture dependend package? I don't > > like seeing the file: vbackup_0.1.6-2_i386.changes (why i386 and not > > all?). Everything is listed as binary-indep but should I also modify the > > configure line to remove --host, --build, CFLAGS and LDFLAGS? > > No, your package is currently arch independant because in > debian/control, you have "Architecture: all". The arch in .changes is > the arch used to compile the packages. Your .deb is: > vbackup_0.1.6.1-1_all.deb OK. I suppose that when you say "compile" you mean something like "prepare", "package", etc... > > > The latest version (-2) is available in mentors. > > I wait for you to add back lines about putting a more up-to-date > config.sub and config.guess. They are not outdated right now but they > could be in some distant future. I restored the lines but I don't quite understand your comment. Since config.sub and config.guess are not used by vbackup at all why are they needed for debian? vbackup is a set of shell scripts and currently there is no intention to include code that requires compilation. I've sent the 3rd version to mentors but it didn't show at the web interface. Looking at ftp://mentors.debian.net/ I see that there are other packages left in the same condition too. Is this expected behaviour ? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
