Hello Michal, On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 22:07 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote:
> > > - also license information in debian/copyright does not seem to be > > > sufficient, you should be more detailed (or use new machine readable > > > format, see http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat) > > > > Thanks a lot for this pointer. I've completely rewritten the copyright > > file. One question though: Do I actually have to include the license > > text for popular licenses? (in this case: GPL-any) > > Why do you use some random older revision of proposal? I'm afraid I don't understand. I am using the proposal from the page you were referring. Other than the revision number from the example in the proposal, I have no idea which newer revisions could possibly exist. > Yes you should include something like: > > License-Terms: GPL-2 > On Debian and Debian-based systems, a copy of the GNU General Public > License version 2 is available in /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2. Ok, thanks. The problem is, there is no text for 'GPL-any'. I am inclined to write something to the effect of: "On Debian and Debian-based systems, a copy of the GNU General Public Licenses are available in /usr/share/common-licenses." Would this be ok? > If you would use lintian, you would find it: Sorry, I overlooked the lintian error that was printed with the build process. I will have a closer look in the future. (I have locally fixed all your other concerns.) Best regards, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
