Hi Vincent, hello Michal, thanks for helping me with the package.
I have uploaded a fixed package to mentors.debian.net. On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 19:02 +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > In debian/changelog, remove the mention about this package being your > first. Most users are not interested in thisinformation. I removed the line. Note that "This is my first Debian package." is explicitely stated as an example in the New Maintainers' Guide at http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-dreq.en.html#s-changelog Maybe the document should be changed then? > In debian/control, your dependencies are too strict. I relaxed the dependencies. However, how can I know that my package actually works with all HTTP daemons? I cannot test them all. > I think that you should not ship htaccess file (or as documentation). It > is usually better to put all configuration in Apache configuration > file. For example, by default, rewrite rules are not authorized in > htaccess. You can put the content of htaccess in your apache2.conf file > for example. What do you mean by "rewrite rules are not authorized"? Is it perhaps better to not deviate from upstream in this case (htaccess comes from upstream)? I could try to convince upstream to change this with the next version. On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 18:45 +0200, Michal Čihař wrote: > - also license information in debian/copyright does not seem to be > sufficient, you should be more detailed (or use new machine readable > format, see http://wiki.debian.org/Proposals/CopyrightFormat) Thanks a lot for this pointer. I've completely rewritten the copyright file. One question though: Do I actually have to include the license text for popular licenses? (in this case: GPL-any) Best regards, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
