George Danchev wrote: > On Sunday 25 May 2008, Colin Tuckley wrote: >> Finally, this is the first ever Debian package for vidalia so it should >> have a Debian version of -1. > > I consider such requirement quite suboptimal. 1) you kill history 2) even not > being officially published,
Please go and read what I said. This package has *never* been in Debian so there is *no* history. Uploading it to mentors doesn't really count since it won't stay there after it's been uploaded to Debian. > Even more to consider: > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#increment > and *reasoning* behind. Yes, I know about what Neil has said and while I agree with most of his sponsoring suggestions I disagree with this one. It's more important (in my opinion) that the package history in the archive doesn't have unexplained gaps. Colin -- Colin Tuckley | +44(0)1903 236872 | PGP/GnuPG Key Id Debian Developer | +44(0)7799 143369 | 0x1B3045CE A door is what a cat is perpetually on the wrong side of. - adapted from Ogden Nash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
