Matthias Julius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Agreed. I think debian/copyright should always refer to the exact >> version of the GPL that the package says it's covered under and then >> document whether only that version is permissable or whether the "or >> later" part is available. (The exception is GPL v1, which isn't in >> common-licenses; in that case, right now, I think the best course of >> action is to treat the software as under GPL v2 for Debian's purposes. >> There isn't a lot of software in this category.) > I think the best way is to include the license text in debian/copyright > just like any other license that is not in common-licenses. We probably don't really want to include a copy of the GPLv1 in every Perl package. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
