Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Agreed. I think debian/copyright should always refer to the exact version > of the GPL that the package says it's covered under and then document > whether only that version is permissable or whether the "or later" part is > available. (The exception is GPL v1, which isn't in common-licenses; in > that case, right now, I think the best course of action is to treat the > software as under GPL v2 for Debian's purposes. There isn't a lot of > software in this category.)
I think the best way is to include the license text in debian/copyright just like any other license that is not in common-licenses. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
