Henrik Andreasson wrote: > And a possibillity to "vote" for the package maybe, then a sponsor can > use that information if the want in the decission what packages to sponsor?
I don't like this idea at all. With that, what you will see is that maintainers that have lots of friends, or that are maintaining famous packages, will get a high score. I don't think it will help to distinguish good or interesting packages. Also, I don't think a package should be left behind just because not a lot of people "voted" for it. How about very specific things, like for science tools, for which the big majority don't even understand the purposes? For sure, they wouldn't get a big score with a voting system. It doesn't make them less valuable, and I think it make sense to have them included in main... Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
