On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 06:29:33PM +0800, Wen-Yen Chuang wrote: > Brian Nelson wrote: > >ZhengPeng Hou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I've already splited scim-brodge into scom-brodge-agent > >> scim-brodge-client-gtk, scim-bridge-client-qt, and scim-bridge(a > >> dumy package for upgrade),
I don't think the scim-bridge dummy package is necessary in Debian since scim-bridge was never in a stable release. > >> but now the upstream has added qt4 support, so shall I split it > >> into five? > >Is there any significant difference between the two to give a reason to > >justify having both? > > QT4 and QT3 immodules should be separated. > I think "scim-bridge" can be combined with -agent or -client-gtk. > Maybe "scim-bridge" and *-gtk, *-qt3, *-qt4? > Thus they will still be 4 packages. Scim-bridge is currently a dummy package. Also I would expect scim-bridge package to be some package I just install to get all scim-bridge support, not just some underlying agent binary. If we go this way and have four packages (which I agree is a good split), I suppose the package names should be: scim-bridge-common (or scim-bridge-agent), scim-bridge-gtk, scim-bridge-qt3, and scim-bridge-qt4. Ming 2007.08.11 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
