On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 02:25:16AM -0400, Brian Nelson wrote: > ZhengPeng Hou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > hi all, > > I've already splited scim-brodge into scom-brodge-agent > > scim-brodge-client-gtk, scim-bridge-client-qt, and scim-bridge(a > > dumy package for upgrade), but now the upstream has added qt4 > > support, so shall I split it into five? likde -agent, -client-gtk > > -client-qt3, and -client-qt4? is this scheme ok? > > Is there any significant difference between the two to give a reason to > justify having both? If not, I'd just pick the best supported one and > just package that.
(IIUC you are talking about the -qt3 and -qt4 packages.) Both the Qt3 and Qt4 "client" are built from the same source package. They are just some plugin-like shared object modules that can be loaded by Qt3/4 applications at runtime so that they can use input methods. The Qt3 and Qt4 modules fit into different plugin/module framework (the Qt3 and Qt4 ones, of course) and support different applications. Ming 2007.08.11 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
