Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Le Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 04:01:39PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko a écrit :
>> * Maintainer address set to >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and since none of us >> is DD yet we saw no point to include us in Uploaders. This fact makes >> lintian unhappy and complaining about changelog-should-mention-nmu, >> source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number > I am in the same situation with some debian-med packages, and I ended up > adding myself in Uploaders. I think that it is important that the users > have a clue that there are real persons which take care of the packages. > Also, the definition of the Uploaders field in the policy is broader > than what its name suggests. In fact, it does not mention uploading at > all! Technically, Uploaders is basically anyone who is listed in changelog entries. If you list yourself as the author of a version in debian/changelog, you should be in Uploaders. In practice, I agree with... > In the end, I think that it is safe to think the Uploaders field as a > "Co-maintainers" field. This is also how it is presented in > packages.qa.debian.org... ...this. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
