On 25-Apr-2006, Ted Percival wrote: > Paul Wise wrote: > > * debian/changelog: the version should be 0.0.20051212 or > > 0.0.0.20051212 or something so that if upstream changes their > > version scheme, you won't have to use [an] epoch. > > Isn't that exactly what the epoch is for?
In a way. It's still much better to plan the version numbering scheme to avoid epoch changes. -- \ "Everything is futile." -- Marvin of Borg | `\ | _o__) | Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
