On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 10:09:34PM +0200, Le_Vert wrote: > Le mardi 25 avril 2006 ?? 11:20 +0800, Paul Wise a ??crit : > > On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 23:48 +0200, Le_Vert wrote: > > > > > spcaview : package review needed > > > > The convention is RFC: package -- package description > > > > > http://www.le-vert.net/divers/debian-package/spcaview/spcaview_20051212-1.dsc > > I'm using dpatch right now, pretty nice, thanks :-) FYI many people are now starting to use quilt.
> > * debian/watch: please add one (read uscan(1) for more info) > > Added. Looks great but is it usefull ? Can I receive an e-mail when my > package is no more up to date ? I don't think there is any .d.o service for this (yet). I have a wishlist bug against devscripts for a local cronjob example that will query DEHS to do this, though. I also have a 30 line "webdiff" script I'm running nightly against a couple pages, which I supposed could be used to do the same thing. > > E: spcaview source: debian-rules-missing-required-target binary-indep > > N: > > N: The debian/rules file for this package does not provide one of the > > N: required targets. All of build, binary, binary-arch, binary-indep, and > > N: clean must be provided, even if they don't do anything for this > > N: package. > > N: > > N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 4.8 for details. > > N: > > W: spcaview; A binary links against a library it does not use symbols from > > This package contains a binary that links against a library that is > > not in the Depends line. This may also be a bug in the library which > > does not have a shlibs file. > > Binary-indep rule added. What's about the second one ? My lintian > doesn't give this warning (Etch). unstable does have a newer lintian; I don't know if thats the cause. You still know lintian -I, right? I guess ldd -u might help find the cause. Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
