> Putting script libraries into /usr/lib does not break systems mounted in > such manner, it only increases number of files that should be stored > separately for each architecture.
Yes, I was quite wondering that too, and people tend to disagree on that point, and some people tend to be walking around filing RC bugs on this regard. I *think* that it is valid for scripts to reside in /usr/lib, especially when they are executables, or those which are libraries. /usr/share should really be restricted to shared data. Scripts may have some architecture dependency etc., right ? /usr/share is sharable among different architectures as well. regards, junichi