> > Incidentally, why is the source package called 'gphoto2'? I see that > > there is still a 'gphoto' package in Debian; is that not superseded by > > gphoto 2.0? Are there reasons that someone would need both gphoto and > > gphoto2 installed on their system, or why some people need one and > > others need the other? > > No gphoto and gphoto2 are really different and both should be available. > gphoto is a all-in-one package to provide gui access to a digital > camera. > gphoto2 is a library which is used by frontend (gui). A command-line > frontend is included in the package but others are available.
Then why not libgphoto2? Or something making it more obvious it's a lib?s YA
