Hi Pablo! < BTW, donde em brasil? gusto muito de cantar bossa nova (com violao) ...>
eh, I better use english ... Thanks very much for your response, its very nice to see an interest in qaptivate. Friday 03 August 2001 02:26, thought came forth thus: > Great work. I can adopt it. shucks, thanks :). > Please send me the orig.tar.gz, the .changes, the .dsc and the > .diff.gz files (or point it at your webpage). As qaptivate is a debian native I have not done the diffs etc. yet - the original tar.gz is at: http://linuxmechanix.com/debian/qaptivate-0.3.3.tar.gz and CVS is available as the qaptivate module at unilinux.sourceforge.net ( I think the pserver is still working at sf ..) Here's what is happening right now - I have received three replies since yesterday ( much more and quicker than I expected ..) and I am not sure what to do about that right now. It looks to me as though you may have the most strength in maintaining C/C++ (?) which is good, but I really don't know how to approach figuring out who ought to adopt. One of the other people is a maintainer (tony mancill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) and the other (Tim Klein) is not a maintainer but may be good with C++ and has an interest in contributing to the code (which needs it ;}). Personally, I am quite open to more than one person contributing to qaptivate and I am wondering if the people that are interested should discuss the situation together to see who might be the "Good Parent" for qaptivate for now ...? Also, I am _very_ busy for the next week or two and cannot devote more than a very little time to qaptivate. But, if you can be a little patient with me I will have time to put into this after that. aaack, must get back to work .. Thanks all! -- erik --------- LinuxMechanix.com Portland, OR 503 493 9006 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= --------------------------------- | Do you think it isn't difficult not to not have | negative hallucinations? | --anonymous ---------------------------------