On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:19:50PM +0100, Paul Martin wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:09:51PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > > > OTOH, isn't a license just required for *using* software that falls > > under the patent -- in contrast to just distributing it? How is > > distributing lame different from distributing implementations of RSA > > one year ago? We did that. > > The RSA patent was only valid in the USA, an oversight on RSA's part. > That's the difference. With Fraunhofer being a German company, they have > obtained patents in Europe as well as the USA.
Would there be a problem with an installer-package for lame? --Adam -- Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
