On Tue, May 08, 2001 at 05:49:06PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't > > be legally redistributed in binary form.
Which is why URL's to it aren't supposed to be mentioned on public lists :P > > deb http://lly.org/~rcw/private/lamer/ ./ I just broke this. > I believe rcw still maintains this, I have it commented out, since I dont > use lame anymore. "Maintains" would be a severe overstatement, I don't think I've touched anything in there in about a year. If someone wants to take over that, email me privately. Preferably someone outside the US or Germany. -- Robert Woodcock - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "* We used to try various strange things. Let's not." -- seen in linux/fs/buffer.c
