On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 10:08 +0100, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote: > Hi Phil, > > I like the new synthetic preamble and failure summary, I would just > suggest to mention what the tests are about, e.g. instead of just > > Le 2025-02-13 05:57, Phil Wyett a écrit : > > > > Test 1: Pass > > Test 2: Pass > > Test 3: Pass > > Test 4: Pass > > Test 5: Pass > > Test 6: Pass > > Test 7: Fail > > make it > > > Test 1 (reproducibility): Pass > > Test 2 (pbuilder): Pass > > Test 3 (build twice): Pass > > Test 4 (sbuild): Pass > > Test 5 (ratt): Pass > > Test 6 (debian/watch): Pass > > Test 7 (licenserecon): Fail > > Also you could maybe still provide a more detailed log of detected > (potential) issues (similar to the current format) as a text attachment. > > Cheers, >
Julien, Thanks for the feedback. I have added the additional info to the test lines. There will still be detailed information where issues exist, I will just be taking additional time to weed out anything that is blatantly not necessary in reports. See how it goes and we can adjust if required. Regards Phil -- Donations... Buy Me A Coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg -- "I play the game for the game’s own sake" Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans -- Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas Website: https://kathenas.org Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg --
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
