Soren,

On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:51, Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:47:14 PM MST Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > gcc-14-doc has been uploaded by Bastian German (BTW, Bastian, thank
> > you) and is currently waiting for the NEW processing.
> > I don't know what are his plans for gcc-doc-defaults.
>
> OK.
>
> If you will push changes to Salsa for the small issues identified below (and
> add an entry for yourself to debian/copyright under debian/*) I will sponsor
> the package.

Ack. I'm currently at the OSS EU & LPC, I will update the repo on
salsa closer to the weekend and ping you afterwards.
Just in case: I was thinking about adding the changes into the new
revision of the package (and then making the upload include changes
from both releases). Is that suitable from your POV?

>
> Thank you for your good packaging work.
>
> > > On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:31:16 PM MST Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > > Soren,
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:27, Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> wrote:
> > > > > Dmitry,
> > > > >
> > > > > debian/source/format lists this package as 3.0 (native).  Is Debian
> the
> > > > > upstream for this package?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, see how gcc-defaults handle the same case.
> > > >
> > > > > You should delete the debian/compat file as it is deprecated.
> > > > >
> > > > > In debian/control you should build-depend on "debhelper (= 13)".
> > > >
> > > > Ack.
> > > >
> > > > > You should add "Rules-Requires-Root: no” to debian/control (I assume
> you
> > > > > don’t need root to build this package).
> > > >
> > > > Ack.
> > > >
> > > > > As an example, see:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/
> > >
> > > control?
> > >
> > > > > ref_type=heads
> > > > >
> > > > > debian/copyright says:
> > > > >
> > > > > Source: <ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.9.1/gcc-4.9.1.tar.bz2>,
> notice
> > > > >
> > > > >  that this package only contains several license files.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that current?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, we haven't been updating it since that time, it wasn't required.
> > > >
> > > > > Comment:
> > > > >  This package was put together by Nikita V. Youshchenko
> > > > >  <yo...@debian.org>
> > > > >  on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:34:35 +0400.
> > > > >  .
> > > > >  Copyright (C) 2006, Nikita V. Youshchenko <yo...@debian.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > This looks obsolete (replaced by the debian/* entry).
> > > >
> > > > Ack.
> > > >
> > > > > Can you give me a little bit of background on why parts of this
> package
> > >
> > > are
> > >
> > > > > non-free?  I am having a hard time imagining that the Free Software
> > > > > Foundation released a bunch of documentation that isn’t DFSG-free.
> > > >
> > > > The documentation is released under GFDL with invariant sections. It's
> > > > considered non-DFSG-free.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Soren Stoutner
> > > so...@debian.org
>
>
> --
> Soren Stoutner
> so...@debian.org



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Reply via email to