Dmitry, Thanks for your quick answers below.
Piuparts fails because of the following: The following packages have unmet dependencies: cpp-doc : Depends: cpp-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not installable gcc-doc : Depends: gcc-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not installable gccgo-doc : Depends: gccgo-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not installable gfortran-doc : Depends: gfortran-14-doc (>= 14.2.0-1~) but it is not installable It looks like Debian currently has cpp-13-doc (I assume the rest are the same). Do these packages need to be updated at the same time? On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:31:16 PM MST Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > Soren, > > On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:27, Soren Stoutner <so...@debian.org> wrote: > > Dmitry, > > > > debian/source/format lists this package as 3.0 (native). Is Debian the > > upstream for this package? > > Yes, see how gcc-defaults handle the same case. > > > You should delete the debian/compat file as it is deprecated. > > > > In debian/control you should build-depend on "debhelper (= 13)". > > Ack. > > > You should add "Rules-Requires-Root: no” to debian/control (I assume you > > don’t need root to build this package). > > Ack. > > > As an example, see: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/soren/privacybrowser/-/blob/master/debian/ control? > > ref_type=heads > > > > debian/copyright says: > > > > Source: <ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gcc/gcc-4.9.1/gcc-4.9.1.tar.bz2>, notice > > > > that this package only contains several license files. > > > > Is that current? > > Yes, we haven't been updating it since that time, it wasn't required. > > > Comment: > > This package was put together by Nikita V. Youshchenko <yo...@debian.org> > > on Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:34:35 +0400. > > . > > Copyright (C) 2006, Nikita V. Youshchenko <yo...@debian.org> > > > > This looks obsolete (replaced by the debian/* entry). > > Ack. > > > Can you give me a little bit of background on why parts of this package are > > non-free? I am having a hard time imagining that the Free Software > > Foundation released a bunch of documentation that isn’t DFSG-free. > > The documentation is released under GFDL with invariant sections. It's > considered non-DFSG-free. -- Soren Stoutner so...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
