Phil,

Would you be willing to run your suite of triage tests against the most recent 
upload of electrum-nmc?

On Thursday, September 12, 2024 3:51:06 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> Nicholas,
> 
> >On 2024-09-01 04:52, Phil Wyett wrote:
> >> 2. Lintian [3]: Issue
> >> 
> >> I: electrum-nmc source: uses-deprecated-python-stdlib chunk (deprecated
> >> in
> >> Python 3.11, removed in Python 3.13)
> >
> >In a previous review it was mentioned that the
> >"uses-deprecated-python-stdlib" lintian output was "Information only,
> >future for upstream." To clarify, is this still the case, or has it been
> >long enough for it to become an issue?
> 
> It is not a problem for packaging this right now, as Debian currently has
> Python 3.12.  But, this lintian tag was added now because a lot of these
> changes require upstream to alter the program, so everyone needs to start
> working on it now.  If this isn’t fixed when Python 3.13 because the default
> in Debian, the program will cease to function.
> 
> So, you don’t need to worry about it for the sponsorship of this package 
now,
> but you do need to start working with upstream to get it fixed soon.
> 
> >> 4. Watch file [uscan --force-download]: Issue
> >> 
> >> philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/electrum-nmc-
> >> 4.0.6$ uscan --force-download
> >> Newest version of electrum-nmc on remote site is 4.0.6.4.0.6, local
> >> version
> >> is 4.0.6
> >> 
> >>  => Newer package available from:
> >>         =>
> >> 
> >> https://www.namecoin.org/files/electrum-nmc/electrum-nmc-4.0.6/Electrum-NMC
> >> ->>sourceonly-4.0.6.tar.gz gpgv: Signature made Fri Dec 22 05:51:24 2023
> >> GMT
> >> gpgv:                using EDDSA key
> >> A0BE08C865661A9316E0A7FF762ED28DA5C007DA
> >> gpgv: Good signature from "Jeremy Rand (Namecoin Electrum-NMC Binary
> >> Signing
> >> Key) <jer...@namecoin.org>"
> >> Successfully renamed ../Electrum-NMC-sourceonly-4.0.6.tar.gz to
> >> ../electrum-
> >> nmc_4.0.6.4.0.6.orig.tar.gz.
> >> 
> >> Would it not be easier to pull from the GitHub tags of the package?
> >
> >Is this uscan confusion (4.0.6.4.0.6) a problem? If so I suppose I could
> >indeed pull from GitHub.
> 
> I didn’t take a look at your debian/watch file, but I can do so if you still
> need help.
> 
> As mentioned in the comment on Mentors[1], I would recommend you include the
> package under the Debian Cryptocoin Team.  If you would like to do so, 
please
> let me know what your Salsa name is and I will create a repository and share
> it with you.
> 
> I don’t typically like to go any further with sponsorship reviews until they
> have passed all of Phil’s triage tests.  I’ll look forward to his review of
> your second upload.
> 
> [1] https://mentors.debian.net/package/electrum-nmc/


-- 
Soren Stoutner
so...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to