> A few to look at and verify. > > AGPL-3+ | BSL-1.0 openvpn3-core/deps/vcpkg- > ports/asio/vcpkg.json > AGPL-3+ | GPL-3 openvpn3- > core/openvpn/asio/asioresolverres.hpp > AGPL-3+ | Unicode-DFS-2015 openvpn3-core/openvpn/common/unicode- > impl.hpp > AGPL-3+ | GPL-3 openvpn3- > core/openvpn/crypto/tls_crypt_v2.hpp > AGPL-3+ | GPL-3 openvpn3-core/openvpn/mbedtls/util/pem.hpp > AGPL-3+ | APSL-2.0 and/or BSD-4-Clause-UC openvpn3- > core/openvpn/netconf/ios/net-route.h > AGPL-3+ | GPL-3 openvpn3-core/openvpn/openssl/util/pem.hpp
To be honest, I'm at an end with the licences and about ready to throw in the towel, every time there is a review, there is a vague remark that there is an issue with the licences and to be honest, I have no clue what the real problem is. What is wrong. The dual licences, the 'conflicts' some ppl point me to? A lot of work has been put in the licences already and I am not certain that the automated tools can pick out the issues and solutions and every time someone reviews, there is a new remark on the licences. What frustrates me about this is that, if you ask feedback from 2 people, you get 3 different answers. > 4. Watch file (uscan --force-download): There is no indexable location to download the sources (something I passed along to upstream and they might consider for subsequent release) and even then, this is a dfsg package; I can't use it without repackaging at least part of the code. > Additional... > > A. Please update 'Standards-Version' in 'debian/control' to 4.7.0 as per > Debian policy[5]. That is not really a problem. -- g. Marc GPG: 827C FD74 BA46 8152 A041 F3A0 7A6A 4F17 5995 A65B
