Hi, > > > Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference > > > about versioning what -2.1 actually means... > > > > I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1 as debian > > revision. > > It's not negative -- and every other aspect you mentioned is also true. What > Rene meant is that this notation (Debian version including a dot ".") is > reserved for non-maintainer uploads, NMUs.
Thanks. Now revision 3 is on sf. I must admit that I skipped the NMU chapter. But still I do not find such a statement that dots in debian revision are reserved. Chapter 5.11.4.1 of the developers-reference says "should add a new minor version number". Does this imply that a minor version number may not exist before? Kind regards, Alexander -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
