On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Alexander Bürger wrote: > > Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference > > about versioning what -2.1 actually means... > > I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1 as debian > revision. [...] > says "lt" to me. Please tell me what is wrong, and where I can find that > info.
Debian revisions containing a dot are reserved for special purposes, 2.1 designates a source NMU, and 2.1.1 would be a binary-NMU of this source NMU 2.1. See http://www.at.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-nmu http://www.at.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-porter-guidelines hth, cu andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
