On Sunday 04 January 2004 19:41, Mattia Dongili wrote: > I packaged cpufreqd version 1.1-rc1 and called it 1.1-rc-1, now 1.1 is > out...
If you use an epoch to solve this problem, you will be stuck with it forever. I urge you to avoid this if you can. (You can.) > the less ugly debian version name I found is *1.1.final-1*. Is it ok or > has anybody a better suggestion? What about simply 1.1.0-1? Either one is certainly better than an epoch. This way, when 1.2 is released, you can go back to simply using 1.2-1. For your next set of RC packages, you might use a scheme such as 1.1.90+1.2rc1 or something that will evaulate as less than 1.2, but I'm sure you've already figured that out. =) Cheers, nate -- Nathaniel W. Turner http://www.houseofnate.net/ Tel: +1 508 579 1948 (mobile) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
