Em 01-01-2018 14:02, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu: > On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 10:47:26AM -0500, The Wanderer wrote: >> On 2018-01-01 at 10:39, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 01:30:16PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: >>>> The package is orphan now and what it is seems as best can be done >>>> by who wants to do the job. >>> >>> So your argument is "the package is not developed anymore (?) and >>> was always like that, so let's not touch it too much"? >> >> I parsed his statement as meaning "Okay, since my opinion as maintainer >> of this package isn't being accepted, I'm declaring the package >> orphaned; now anyone who wants to work on it can do so". >> >> I mean, I hope I'm wrong, because orphaning would be a drastic and >> unfortunate outcome from this - but that's how I interpret it. > > Hell, no, that was definitely not what I meant. > > It probably is my fault in misunderstanding its usage of the "orphan" > word above, see "The package is orphan now". I didn't want to read "I > orphaned the package" in that, and definitely I wasn't even thinking of > that outcome. > > - https://bugs.debian.org/886013 > > Herbert: In no way I was even thinking of you giving up the package! > (Also, I believe the only person interested in the package is Jonhatan) >
Please be calm everybody. I really liked to do the package. It has an not common debian/rules. But I am not in love with the package. I am a domestic user who wants to be a programmer. I do not know complex situations where different scenarios come up. My usage (computer) is simple. I do not have a camera yet, but I am more closed to libgphoto2, gphoto2, gthumb. And some python packages. Packages come and go.
