Hi Jakub,
upstream released a new version of openfst.
On 15/03/2016 11:33, Giulio Paci wrote:
> On 11/03/2016 16:34, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>> * Giulio Paci <giuliop...@gmail.com>, 2016-03-08, 22:24:
>>>> we do seem to have an s390x buildd with only 3GB of RAM:
>>>> https://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=zemlinsky
>>>
>>> So we may have a failure there. :-/
>>
>> Perhaps. But with the current limits, the package would be built with -j1
>> there, so reducing parallelism further wouldn't help. Let's not worry about
>> zemlinsky for now. :)
>>
>> Comments in src/extensions/python/*.cc say that the files were generated by
>> Cython, but I don't see their Cython sources in the tarball. :-\
>
> You are right. I did not notice as I have disabled that extension (it is
> available also in pypi, so that one can be packaged if anybody is interested).
> I asked upstream and they agreed to release the .pyx file in the next openfst
> release.
>
> Essentially we are waiting:
> 1) .pyx file release;
This issue has been addressed.
> 2) openfst patch for Kaldi review.
This issue has not been addressed. As far as I know no progress at all has been
made.
If you agree as this patch is a prerequisite for having Kaldi in Debian (which
is one of my goals), I would include this patch without having it approved by
upstream.
I am confident that they will approve it once they will find time to evaluate
it, but I am not confident they will evaluate it very soon.
Bests,
Giulio
