Hi, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > So, it might take people 3 years, but YMMV. > The problem is that the last step doesn't have an odometer, nor a gas gauge, thus you don't know your mileage until you arrive.
Anyway, [1] states that the DAM does have a backup (joey). Apparently, both haven't been able to do any NM processing for the past six weeks. Might it be possible to replace the single-point-of-failure DAM with a Peer Review system? I.e., some DDs (the existing AMs?) are tasked with checking the AM reports; three(?) YES votes approves the new maintainer, one NO vote (with justification please...) relegates them to the DAM. If people think this is a good idea, I am willing, and actually have the time, to extend the NM pages to implement this. [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint#DAM -- Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de -- SOS 1. (ess-oh-ess) n. A losing editor, SON OF STOPGAP. 2. (sahss) v. Inverse of AOS, from the PDP-10 instruction set. -- From the AI Hackers' Dictionary -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
