On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 02:09:04PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote: > christophe =?iso-8859-15?Q?barb=E9?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:32:39AM +0100, David Spreen wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > > > christophe barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > Just done that and finally got the following on the base directory: > > > > gphoto2-2.0beta3.orig.tar.gz > > > > > > Yes, it has to be gphoto2_2.0beta3.orig.tar.gz > > > See? It has to be a _ not a - between the packagename and the version- > > > number. > > > > > > so long... > > > > That's it. > > Thanks > > Did you see my advices ?
About 2.0beta3 and 2.0-beta3 ? If so, yes. But as you can read in replys to your mail, the situation is already there (2.0beta2 is in the archive). Christophe > > > -- > Jérôme Marant > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Christophe Barbé <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG FingerPrint: E0F6 FADF 2A5C F072 6AF8 F67A 8F45 2F1E D72C B41E L'experience, c'est une connerie par jour mais jamais la même. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
