Re: building binary-only package with different name?

[Ove Kaaven]

On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Peter van Rossum wrote:

> Yes, of course, and that is what I did. But the actual question was:
> how do I get dpkg-buildpackage to give the potato version a different
> *name*? Just renaming the files gives problems with the signature on
> the .changes/.dsc files.

If you're just going to put these on the webpage, why would you even need
the .changes file? (And the .dsc is only for the source package, so you
don't need that for the potato build either)

I'd put the potato and woody build in different directories, then I
wouldn't need to rename, but if you don't want to, I don't see why you
can't rename the potato build and drop the .changes file.


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]