Re: building binary-only package with different name?

[Brian Russo]

On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:49:55PM +0100, Peter van Rossum wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 11:45:08AM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> But anyway, that's not the problem. I don't need the binary package to
> work both on potato and on woody - I just want an easy way to create two
> different versions of the binary package, one that works on potato
> and one that works on woody.

compile one on woody for woody
compile one on potato for potato.

That /is/ the easy way for your run of the mill binary package.


-- 
Brian Russo      <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian/GNU Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member"    <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>   http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]