On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 04:45:10PM -0400, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 10:39:46AM -0500, An Thi-Nguyen Le wrote:
> >
> > In particular, I want to (eventually) adopt the fvwm[1] packages. I have
> > toyed with the idea of contacting the current maintainer offering these
> > packages even though I haven't been contacted by an AM yet but I'm
> > not sure if that's right or wrong.
Only even contemplate adopting fvwm if you know or are willing to work
hard at learning Xlib. It's a tough package (as I discovered to my
cost.) There are a couple of people who have expressed interest, and
when I have time to go through my inbox (soon, I really hope, but RL
is crazy right now), I will see whether they want it. Do you want me
to add you to the list?
Julian
(current fvwm maintainer)
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
