Am Freitag, den 31.12.2021, 18:29 +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > On 12/31/21 6:05 PM, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 31.12.2021, 17:13 +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > > On 12/30/21 12:47 PM, Uecker, Martin wrote: > > > > Also the identical bart-cuda package (in master-contrib) > > > > fails to build on salsa because it says the > > > > nvidia-cuda-toolkit is uninstallable. But I guess one > > > > could give it a try. > > > > > > Martin, bart-cuda fails its (last) autopkgtest stalling testing > > > migration, see here[1] > > > Can you fix this? > > > > > > [1]: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=bart-cuda > > > > Yes, it was running the tests for the bart package but then > > the older version of the package was still installed and > > the test failed. I pushed a fix. > > Thanks! > > > But I am still > > pondering why it is not fully reproducible.... > > You could try running reprotest on it once, and check the diffoscope log for > hints. > The build-ID was different, most likely a build path issue. > > > Thanks again for your help! Can I do something to make > > this easier? For bart-cuda I think it is is Ok to > > only upload for amd64. But it would be good if we > > could extend the CI pipeline on salsa to test > > beforehand. > > Yeah, right. I think we will need to talk to salsa CI team about this, by > opening an issue > ticket here[1] asking to enable pipeline also for contrib/non-free > > [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline
It seems we can activiate this ourselves. I just tried this. Martin
