On 12/31/21 6:05 PM, Uecker, Martin wrote:
Am Freitag, den 31.12.2021, 17:13 +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
On 12/30/21 12:47 PM, Uecker, Martin wrote:
Also the identical bart-cuda package (in master-contrib)
fails to build on salsa because it says the
nvidia-cuda-toolkit is uninstallable. But I guess one
could give it a try.
Martin, bart-cuda fails its (last) autopkgtest stalling testing migration, see
here[1]
Can you fix this?
[1]: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=bart-cuda
Yes, it was running the tests for the bart package but then
the older version of the package was still installed and
the test failed. I pushed a fix.
Thanks!
But I am still
pondering why it is not fully reproducible....
You could try running reprotest on it once, and check the diffoscope log for
hints.
The build-ID was different, most likely a build path issue.
Thanks again for your help! Can I do something to make
this easier? For bart-cuda I think it is is Ok to
only upload for amd64. But it would be good if we
could extend the CI pipeline on salsa to test
beforehand.
Yeah, right. I think we will need to talk to salsa CI team about this, by
opening an issue
ticket here[1] asking to enable pipeline also for contrib/non-free
[1]: https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline
Regards,
Nilesh
