On Sat, 13 Nov 2021, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Do we have a, sort of ETA to do this?
> I do it > A) if I have time _and_ > B) I find some specific issue on a package > Issues can be RC bugs, package not in testing, broken watch file etc. > There are packages I gave up. For instance I have some mental note on > fsl saying: non-free, outdated (upstream has version 6.0) and terribly > complex. yeah, don't bother with FSL! Even though still popular, non-free license, and no longer fully open source AFAIK. If any other alternative in purpose -- pick up AFNI please. Major (if not all) licensing issues were resolved, we never uploaded to debian proper though. Upstream is very receptive and friendly. Problems: - age (in how long it has been out there, but it is still active) - original build infrastructure was "suboptimal",Michael redid in cmake, upstream worked on establishing their own cmake build infra but they are not actively use it our aged, not updated in awhile packaging: https://github.com/neurodebian/afni/tree/debian upstream: https://afni.nimh.nih.gov/ https://github.com/afni/afni -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
