Dear Nilesh, Thank you very much for your help!
On 4/06/21 11:45, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Hi Sébastien > > On Fri, 4 Jun, 2021, 2:15 pm Sébastien Jodogne, > <s.jodo...@orthanc-labs.com <mailto:s.jodo...@orthanc-labs.com>> wrote: > > > Adrian (Bunk) replied that "This is fixable with a +really version." > [...] > +really is used when version changes aren't consistent, or you need to > downgrade. > > In this case, you would want to downgrade orthanc right? To be fair, I am unsure whether I need to downgrade orthanc to 1.9.2, or to make an additional operation on 1.9.3. > So you should use this trick only for orthanc to my understanding. In the hypothesis that I must downgrade from "orthanc-1.9.3+dfsg-1" to "orthanc-1.9.2+dfsg-1", should I upload a release with version "orthanc-1.9.2+really" to unstable? Or should I name it "orthanc-1.9.2+dfsg-1-really"? In practice, should I first sync my git repository with the tag "orthanc-1.9.2+dfsg-1", do the modifications and upload to unstable, then merge back my modifications in the mainline of the git repository, and finally upload "orthanc-1.9.3+dfsg-2" to experimental? > Also note that it is unclear to me what exact package should be put in > "Built-Using". Is it "src:orthanc", "liborthancframework1", or > "liborthancframework-dev", > > > All libraries that you have statically linked against. See the binary > packages that are relevant/contain the files that are being used for linking > > with or without version? > > > With version, and more specifically with an exactly = relation. > Please see the Debian Developers reference wherein it's clearly explained. >From what I see in the Debian Developers reference [1], and from your explanations, I guess I should use: Built-Using: liborthancframework-dev (= 1.9.2+really) Thanks again, Sébastien- [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
