Hi, On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 04:46:38PM +0000, B Thomas wrote: > > I have no problem. Just that I would have preferred to use a different > email address for mailing lists to keep the spam bots at check.
Argh, sorry about that. > > Are you sure about this? I get: > > Here is the build error I see (different from yours) > > [ 9%] Building CXX object > source/CMakeFiles/roadrunner-static.dir/rrRoadRunner.cpp.o > cd > /home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/source > && /usr/bin/c++ -DBUILD_LLVM -DLIBLAX_STATIC -DLIBSBML_STATIC > -DLIBSBML_USE_CPP_NAMESPACE -DPOCO_NO_AUTOMATIC_LIBS -DPOCO_STATIC > -DSTATIC_LIBSTRUCT -DSTATIC_NLEQ1 -DSTATIC_NLEQ2 -DSTATIC_PUGI -DSTATIC_RR > -I/home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner > -I/home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner/third_party > -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/lib/llvm-7/include > -I/home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/source > -I/home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner/source/. > -I/usr/include/rr-libstruct -I/usr/include/sbml -I/usr/include/cvode -g -O2 > -fdebug-prefix-map=/home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner=. > -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -o > CMakeFiles/roadrunner-static.dir/rrRoadRunner.cpp.o -c > /home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner/source/rrRoadRunner.cpp > In file included from > /home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner/source/rrRoadRunner.cpp:11: > /home/bt/debian/sysbio/roadrunner/git/roadrunner/source/rrRoadRunner.h:5:10: > fatal error: rr-libstruct/lsMatrix.h: No such file or directory > #include "rr-libstruct/lsMatrix.h" > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ OK, thanks to Aaron's hint we are not at same level. I suspect you did not build against Debian sid and the g++ you were using might not be as picky as the latest gcc 10.x. > I was building commit with git sha 183ad2dc76a1a4daa17919f68cdd5c4af64779d8 > CommitDate: Tue May 12 16:53:08 2020 +0200. I was building on > Debian/Stable and prefer to stay on it till next release. Sure, that's fine. But new packages always will be built against sid and thus need to compile there. But as I said that should be settled now. > > and since I have no solution for this I stopped working on this issue > > (and I admit I nearly forgot this project - thanks for bringing it up to > > my radar again ;-) ). > > No problem. Actually I am interested in Debian packages for the > following Tellurium (http://tellurium.analogmachine.org/) (RoadRunner is > one of its dependencies). I will be happy to help in packing both, in > what ever time I can pull out. Let me know how I can help. > > > Where did you found that repository? > > Here is the where I found the git repo for rr-libstruct > > https://github.com/sys-bio/rr-libstruct > > rr-libstruct has one problem. It depends on clapack, which as far as I > understand is deprecated. lapacke is now the standard C interface to > lapack. I am thinking of investigating how easy it will be to > migrate it to lapacke (already in debian) and create a pull request > for upstream. This would be extremely helpful. BTW, if you might have problems with this on debian-scie...@lists.debian.org I once found some help when I needed to port some other package from clapack to lapacke. If you might be successfully with your patch I can have a look into packaging rr-libstruct which looks not like a really big problem (after a *very* quick look!) Thanks a lot for your interest Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
