Hello again, python-cyvcf2 was this accepted into unstable. That was quick.
@Liubov, you are most cordially invited to join the packaging of whatever package you like. Just add yourself as an uploader and send a ping for the upload. You did a very nice job on pybedtools [need to investigate where this is stuck now] and cyvcf2, can't praise you enough for that. On the path to bcbio is also python-pysam that has a new version out. That would then be the opportunity to test its compatibilty with htslib 1.9. Not this week. Best, Steffen On 7/20/18 2:57 PM, Liubov Chuprikova wrote: > Ouch, sorry! I first planned to write also a bit about python-cyvcf2 > that is why I included it in the Subjest. Then I decided to devote to > it a separate letter, but forgot to remove it from the Subject. > > Since this has happened, I am to mention cyvcf2 here. > > On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 at 01:23 Steffen Möller <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > - cyvcf2 is in a new version 0.9.0 now, but, well, tests fail. > > > There was a new upstream version recently in which one of the tests > (issue44) was supposed to be fixed, but hadn't yet [1]. I tried to dig > into this and its other test failures, but they seem to be quite > tricky for me. So I think, Steffen's claim for someone's help with > cyvcf2 and its dependency htslib still remains on the table: > > > It comes > with its own version of htslib, which may well contribute to the > situation since I had nothing better to do than to substitute it with > the one the distribution ships. Is anybody close to upstream on this > list to have a look? > > > With regards, > Liubov > > [1] https://github.com/brentp/cyvcf2/issues/89#issuecomment-406354822
