Hi Karsten, > > By moving orthanc.init into the newly created > > orthanc-sqlite package, I had to move "debian/orthanc.init" > > to "debian/orthanc-sqlite.init". In turn, after > > installation, this renames "/etc/init.d/orthanc.init" as > > "/etc/init.d/orthanc-sqlite.init". > > Whoa, really, why ?
Because other Orthanc plugins (e.g. orthanc-webviewer) need to restart Orthanc after their installation, in order for Orthanc to load them... Concretely, they would need to do either "/etc/init.d/orthanc-sqlite restart" or "/etc/init.d/orthanc-postgresql restart" in their postinst/postrm, depending on the installed back-end. I therefore feel that it is more simple for all these back-ends to use "/etc/init.d/orthanc", so that the plugin packages can be agnostic of the back-end. But maybe I am totally wrong? Sébastien- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/557725456.11829596.1425466921772.javamail.r...@chu.ulg.ac.be
