On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 12:16:06PM +0100, Sébastien Jodogne wrote:
> I have just created and committed a Debian package for the
> official plugin that replaces the default SQLite database of
> Orthanc, by a PostgreSQL back-end [1].
Delightedly I have noted that PG can be used to store both of
index _and_ the actual DICOM instances (?).
If so, I'd be interested to know which way you chose to store
DICOM instances inside PG -- by means of BYTEA columns or as
large objects ?
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/datatype-binary.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/largeobjects.html
(that'll influence recommendations regarding
backup/restore/failover)
For what it is worth, GNUmed uses BYTEA (while being aware of
both its benefits and limitations).
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ eu.pool.sks-keyservers.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150302124814.ge11...@hermes.hilbert.loc
