Hi Charles, On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 06:53:49AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > I guess you spotted the code copy of the HTSlib in python-pysam ?
Well, the code copy existed from the beginning of maintaining python-pysam (at this time compared to the predecessor of htslib). At this time we decided that it is to hard to link dynamically. > In theory, it should be easier to build python-pysam on the system's > copy, compared to the previsous situation with libbam, because > the HTSlib allows for dynamic linking. > > In practice, I do not know how to do it with python modules… Thanks for the hint - we might rethink the current packaging. However, my actual approach is targeting at an upgrade and recheck whether we could fix #753490 (I somehow missed this bug with patch and it does not apply to the new version ... :-() > I opened the following issue on GitHub's upstream tracker. > > https://github.com/pysam-developers/pysam/issues/34 Cool. May be we get some help from upstream. Any help / enhancement is more than welcome. BTW, my push was more an accident since I wanted to write `quilt push` and instead issued `git push`. The current status in Git is not functional and I have some local changes here which also do not yet lead to a working package since the test suite fails. If anybody is interested - I'd be more than happy to hand over this task to somebody else (as always ;-)). Thanks again for the hint Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140820075554.gg15...@an3as.eu
