Le Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:27:13PM +0100, Andreas Tille a écrit : > > Yes, that's known and was mentioned by Charles some time ago. However, > if I understood correctly we need to change something in samtools > packaging anyway and thus I could live for the moment with the samtools > copy and might try to remove it into a future upload.
Hi Andreas and Olivier, the "htslib" that I have packaged is the successor of the "libbam". It brings in dynamic linking, which will make our work easier. However, I do not know to what extent it is a drop-in replacement. The problem that I realise now is that if I update samtools to version 0.2, based on the htslib, the libbam will disappear. For package carrying their convenience copy, this copy solves the problem even if it is not the preferred solution. For other packages, we may have to introduce a libbam-legacy package if their developers do not pick the htslib quickly enough. Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131126231334.gc7...@falafel.plessy.net
