Le Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 08:43:09AM +0200, Benjamin Eikel a écrit : > Am Montag, 16. September 2013, 16:58:43 schrieb Benjamin Eikel: > > Am Sonntag, 15. September 2013, 11:17:34 schrieb Charles Plessy: > > > Le Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:21:58AM +0200, Benjamin Eikel a écrit : > > > > I wrote another e-mail on September 3, 2013 and asked for clarification, > > > > but I did not get an answer yet. > > > > > > Thanks a lot Benjamin and Faheem, > > > > > > if we do not have a better answer, then I think that the best would be to > > > summarise the result of your investigations in debian/README.source and > > > re-upload. > > > > I have uploaded such a file. I do not know if the information given there > > suffices and if citing the mails there is the right way. If you find the > > time, please take a look at it. > > Hi Charles, > > is there anything left to do or shall the package be re-uploaded?
Hi Benjamin, I admit that I lost track of the issue, but version 0.4-1 is still in the NEW queue, so to reopen the discussion one has to either send the udpated information or simply re-upload with the information in README.source. On my side, I will do nothing as my frustration made me stop uploading R modules. Cheers, -- Charles Plessy Debian Med packaging team, http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131028131525.gj7...@falafel.plessy.net
