On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 05:39:59PM +0200, Eric Maeker wrote: > > Le 18 juin 2013 à 17:34, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit : > > > Just my two cents, GPL and/or LGPL are mostly related to code (notion > > of 'shared' lib). I would either check one of our french license > > CeCILL A/B/C or maybe creative commons which are more oriented with > > data stuff. > > Yes GPL/LGPL are for the code. I need to enlighten the future debate > of the licensing choice for the scientific data. Do you have any > notion about OpenData ? > > CC licenses are not compatible with DFSG I think.
As Mathieu pointed out, that is not the case in general. Also, I believe CC0 (public-domain-like) is considered especially appropriate for data licensing in the OpenData community, but I don't have any links to back that up right now. I am pointing this out here for future reference although it probably runs against their "attribution" requirement in this specific case. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130627140328.ge27...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
