Hi, On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 08:34:14AM +0200, "Steffen Möller" wrote: > > microbiomeutil (20101212-2) unstable; urgency=low
Done. > We all do not like working with epochs, I presume. I personally do not have a problem with epochs but I respect your feelings. :-) > I would also like to point > to the backports.debian.org page on packaging instructions > at http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/#index5h3 Good hint. I was also wondering whether it is a good idea to use the "ubuntu" string inside BioLinux packages. As a (plain) Ubuntu user I would be a bit confused to see this name in the version if a package is not really part of Ubuntu but just an Ubuntu derivative. So if I were you and I would create versions for BioLinux most probably this would be the best idea for versioning: <version>~biolinux-<pkgversion> or <version>-0biolinux<pkgversion> A positive side effect is that people who stumbly by chance about such package will notice the BioLinux string and might become interested in it ... Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130605082541.ga20...@an3as.eu
