On Thu, 07 Feb 2013, Amul Shah wrote:
> On 02/07/2013 12:21 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > >On Thu, 07 Feb 2013, Amul Shah wrote: > >>Andreas/Yaroslav, > >>Thanks to Luis, I setup a pbuilder environment and built GT.M. There > >>are a few lintian warnings and some package naming oddities that I > >>am unsure about. How do I grab the build log, aside from using tee? > >spoiled me uses git-buildpackage (could be called with --pbuilder > >option) and that generates a nice .log for me > >>I say package naming oddity, because the generated deb is named > >>fis-gtm-6.0-001_6.0-001-1_amd64.deb, where I expected to see a deb > >>named fis-gtm_6.0-001-1_amd64.deb. > >per our discussion at kitware some time ago -- we agreed to have > >versioned binary package (i.e. version in the name) to signal that per > >se you can't just upgrade fis-gtm to a new major.minor version to still > >access previous DB -- it needs to be migrated. And that is why it is > >better to be able to co-install 2 (or more) versions at the same > >time. I do not remember though having -001 revision in there, and > >would have expected fis-gtm-6.0_6.0-001-1_amd64.deb, but I could be > >wrong. > [amul:2] That -001 is the sub minor version. Our next release is > going to be V6.0-002. I think we need that in there to allow > V6.0-001 and V6.0-002 to coexist. Correct? We don't need one of > those version numbers, that's for sure. Where are they coming from? > I know one is in debian/control. ah ok -- so you do want co-installability all the way to minor version... then ok in fis-gtm-6.0-001_6.0-001-1_amd64.deb fis-gtm-6.0-001 -- is the source name (find it in debian/control and changelog) then _ to separate the actual version which consists of two pieces -- upstreamversion-debianrevisionout which in this case is 6.0-001-1 ;-) so all legit... if it was an NMU there would be also e.g .1 suffix in debian revision. > >>I can't find the lintian warnings in pbuidler's output, but I did see them > >>in debuild's output. This is what I see in debuild: > >>W: fis-gtm source: changelog-should-mention-nmu > >>W: fis-gtm source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number 6.0-001-1 > >are you listed in Maintainers/Uploaders as well (with identical name in > >the last changelog entry signature)? > [amul:2] I'm listed as an uploader (or at least I think I am). I > don't have a GPG key yet (well I did, but I forgot the password). My > name is in both files, but the email address case is different. here you go -- probably that is it -- make them identical since Steve Smith !=== Steve Smith and email is used also -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko http://neuro.debian.net http://www.pymvpa.org http://www.fail2ban.org Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-med-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130207203058.gb8...@onerussian.com
