On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 11:06:53AM +0200, RKI Andreas wrote: > Well, I don't think that the *real* name of the binary is the > thing which is unclear as long as it is apropriately documented. > The divergence was about the name which is accessible via > /usr/bin. I know.
> I think I stick to > > /usr/lib/plink/plink > > as the real executable in any case OK, that's another perfectly valid approach of the principle I suggested. Even a better one because: > [...] if you add this dir > to your path you are fine with any potentially existing scripts. (as long as the proper "plink" is found first ...) I had thought you wanted to not have any "plink" at all but rather rename the real binary in /usr/bin/ to p-link directly. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
