On Mon, 4 May 2009, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
How about installing the real binary as /usr/bin/plink.ICR
and symlinking to that as /usr/bin/p-link ? That might make
things somewhat clearer.
(ICR - Institute for Cancer Research, where this plink originates)
Well, I don't think that the *real* name of the binary is the
thing which is unclear as long as it is apropriately documented.
The divergence was about the name which is accessible via
/usr/bin. I think I stick to
/usr/lib/plink/plink
as the real executable in any case because if you add this dir
to your path you are fine with any potentially existing scripts.
I don't really mind about the actual name of the link in /usr/bin
as long as it is not plink (existing name clash) or snplink
(potantial name clash) - but it should be accepted by upstream
and propagated to other distributions (Gentoo).
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
