Hi, Thanks for testing, I'm uploading to stretch-security as we speak.
Cheers! Sylvain On 07/10/2020 01:16, Ivan Baldo wrote: > Hello. > "¡Lo prometido es deuda!" as we say in Uruguay (what is promised is a debt). > Tested your packages and now I can see correctly all the scanners, > local and networked ones! > So everything looks good to push those to Debian Stretch. > Thanks a lot for doing all this! > Greetings from another Allegro user&contributor ;-) > > El sáb., 3 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 13:53, Sylvain Beucler > (b...@beuc.net) escribió: >> >> Hi, >> >> The package is in this state since Aug 17, I think we can afford to wait >> a few more days for testing. >> So yes, please do test on Tuesday. >> >> Cheers! >> Sylvain >> >> On 03/10/2020 00:41, Ivan Baldo wrote: >>> Hello. >>> The soonest I could try to check, is this Tuesday 6th 19:00 -0300, sorry. >>> Let me know if that's useful or too late. >>> Thanks! >>> >>> El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 10:22, Sylvain Beucler >>> (b...@beuc.net) escribió: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> On 02/10/2020 13:51, Ivan Baldo wrote: >>>>> El vie., 2 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 06:48, Sylvain Beucler >>>>> (b...@beuc.net) escribió: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>> El jue., 1 de oct. de 2020 a la(s) 19:32, Sylvain Beucler >>>>>>> (b...@beuc.net) escribió: >>>>>>>> This could be due to a bug when building the 'all' and 'amd64' packages >>>>>>>> separately. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can reproduce the 2 debdiff-s with 'debuild -A' and 'debuild -B' >>>>>> respectively. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm currently backporting fixes from 1.0.27-1~experimental3 to fix the >>>>>> issue, and updating our procedures to test this case in the future. >>>>> >>>>> Great, thanks a lot!!! >>>> >>>> I prepared a new package at: >>>> https://www.beuc.net/tmp/debian-lts/sane-backends/ >>>> that I plan to upload as a regression fix. >>>> >>>> (Note: sane-dll is now consistently removed, as it previously evaded >>>> deletion only in amd64, see #971592.) >>>> >>>> Can you test it? >>>> >>>> Cheers! >>>> Sylvain >>> >>> >>> > > >
